[Bug fortran/54818] [4.7/4.8 Regression] error: type mismatch in binary expression

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54818 Tobias Burnus changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug fortran/54818] [4.7/4.8 Regression] error: type mismatch in binary expression

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54818 --- Comment #8 from Tobias Burnus 2012-12-20 10:48:15 UTC --- Author: burnus Date: Thu Dec 20 10:48:11 2012 New Revision: 194632 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=194632 Log: 2012-12-20 Tobias Burnus

[Bug fortran/54818] [4.7/4.8 Regression] error: type mismatch in binary expression

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54818 --- Comment #7 from Tobias Burnus 2012-12-20 08:13:29 UTC --- Author: burnus Date: Thu Dec 20 08:13:21 2012 New Revision: 194628 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=194628 Log: 2012-12-20 Tobias Burnus

[Bug fortran/54818] [4.7/4.8 Regression] error: type mismatch in binary expression

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54818 --- Comment #6 from Tobias Burnus 2012-12-19 09:03:46 UTC --- My patch is wrong. It might lead to passing an integer(8) instead of integer(4) as hidden argument when calling a procedure. The proper way it to use gfc_charlen_type_node. H

[Bug fortran/54818] [4.7/4.8 Regression] error: type mismatch in binary expression

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54818 Tobias Burnus changed: What|Removed |Added CC||burnus at gcc dot gnu.org --- C

[Bug fortran/54818] [4.7/4.8 Regression] error: type mismatch in binary expression

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54818 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P4 CC|

[Bug fortran/54818] [4.7/4.8 Regression] error: type mismatch in binary expression

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54818 Thomas Koenig changed: What|Removed |Added CC||tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org ---

[Bug fortran/54818] [4.7/4.8 Regression] error: type mismatch in binary expression

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54818 --- Comment #3 from Dominique d'Humieres 2012-10-05 10:20:49 UTC --- AFAICT the problem occurs in 64 bit mode, but not in 32 one.

[Bug fortran/54818] [4.7/4.8 Regression] error: type mismatch in binary expression

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54818 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Known to work||4.6.3 Target Milestone|---

[Bug fortran/54818] [4.7/4.8 Regression] error: type mismatch in binary expression

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54818 --- Comment #2 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-10-05 09:09:39 UTC --- Reduced test case: implicit none real :: name = 5. print *, transfer(name,"a")//"xyz" end Fails here with 4.7 and trunk, but works with 4.3. Haven't tried othe

[Bug fortran/54818] [4.7/4.8 Regression] error: type mismatch in binary expression

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54818 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|