[Bug fortran/54687] Use gcc option machinery for gfortran

2020-04-12 Thread dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54687 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|NEW Assignee|dominiq at

[Bug fortran/54687] Use gcc option machinery for gfortran

2019-03-10 Thread egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54687 --- Comment #18 from Eric Gallager --- (In reply to Dominique d'Humieres from comment #17) > Let me have a deeper look at what can be done. How has that deeper look been going?

[Bug fortran/54687] Use gcc option machinery for gfortran

2018-06-10 Thread dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54687 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P5 Status|RESOLVED

[Bug fortran/54687] Use gcc option machinery for gfortran

2018-06-09 Thread egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54687 Eric Gallager changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/54687] Use gcc option machinery for gfortran

2018-03-10 Thread egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54687 Eric Gallager changed: What|Removed |Added CC||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org S

[Bug fortran/54687] Use gcc option machinery for gfortran

2018-03-05 Thread manu at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54687 --- Comment #14 from Manuel López-Ibáñez --- (In reply to Dominique d'Humieres from comment #13) > No activity since over two years. Any objection to close this PR as FIXED? I personally don't mind since I don't use gfortran and I am not plannin

[Bug fortran/54687] Use gcc option machinery for gfortran

2018-03-05 Thread dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54687 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |WAITING --- Comment #13 from Domi

[Bug fortran/54687] Use gcc option machinery for gfortran

2016-02-25 Thread manu at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54687 Manuel López-Ibáñez changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |NEW --- Comment #12 from Manuel Ló

[Bug fortran/54687] Use gcc option machinery for gfortran

2016-02-25 Thread dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54687 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |WAITING

[Bug fortran/54687] Use gcc option machinery for gfortran

2016-02-25 Thread dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54687 --- Comment #11 from Dominique d'Humieres --- What is left in this PR before closing it as FIXED?

[Bug fortran/54687] Use gcc option machinery for gfortran

2014-12-16 Thread burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54687 --- Comment #10 from Tobias Burnus --- Author: burnus Date: Wed Dec 17 06:29:30 2014 New Revision: 218808 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=218808&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2014-12-17 Tobias Burnus PR fortran/54687 gcc/ * fla

[Bug fortran/54687] Use gcc option machinery for gfortran

2014-12-16 Thread manu at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54687 --- Comment #9 from Manuel López-Ibáñez --- (In reply to Tobias Burnus from comment #8) > I concur. I think it also would be useful to support combined options like > Fortran's -ffpe-trap= and -fcheck= or common's -fsanitize=. Total agreement!

[Bug fortran/54687] Use gcc option machinery for gfortran

2014-12-16 Thread burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54687 --- Comment #8 from Tobias Burnus --- (In reply to Manuel López-Ibáñez from comment #5) > > Is there still something missing? > Note that the options machinery has ways to encode String->Enum options, so > things like gfc_handle_coarray_option an

[Bug fortran/54687] Use gcc option machinery for gfortran

2014-12-16 Thread burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54687 --- Comment #7 from Tobias Burnus --- Author: burnus Date: Tue Dec 16 20:44:45 2014 New Revision: 218792 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=218792&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2014-12-16 Tobias Burnus PR fortran/54687 * gfortran.

[Bug fortran/54687] Use gcc option machinery for gfortran

2014-12-16 Thread burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54687 --- Comment #6 from Tobias Burnus --- Missed the PR number for the commit r218790: 2014-12-16 Tobias Burnus PR fortran/54687 * lang.opt (fsecond-underscore, frecord-marker=8, frecord-marker=4, frealloc-lhs, freal-8-re

[Bug fortran/54687] Use gcc option machinery for gfortran

2014-12-11 Thread manu at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54687 Manuel López-Ibáñez changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks|44054 | --- Comment #5 from Manuel López-

[Bug fortran/54687] Use gcc option machinery for gfortran

2014-12-11 Thread burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54687 Tobias Burnus changed: What|Removed |Added CC||burnus at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #4

[Bug fortran/54687] Use gcc option machinery for gfortran

2014-10-07 Thread manu at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54687 --- Comment #3 from Manuel López-Ibáñez --- Author: manu Date: Tue Oct 7 16:13:22 2014 New Revision: 215974 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=215974&root=gcc&view=rev Log: gcc/fortran/ChangeLog: 2014-10-06 Manuel López-Ibáñez PR for

[Bug fortran/54687] Use gcc option machinery for gfortran

2014-04-30 Thread manu at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54687 --- Comment #2 from Manuel López-Ibáñez --- Note that this is a repetitive but trivial task that consists mostly in deleting code. Just take for example Wcompare-reals: Index: gfortran.h ===

[Bug fortran/54687] Use gcc option machinery for gfortran

2012-09-24 Thread manu at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54687 Manuel López-Ibáñez changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|