http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52101
Tobias Burnus changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52101
--- Comment #11 from Tobias Burnus 2012-07-17
09:40:18 UTC ---
Author: burnus
Date: Tue Jul 17 09:40:12 2012
New Revision: 189565
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=189565
Log:
2012-07-17 Tobias Burnus
PR fortran/5
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52101
--- Comment #10 from Tobias Burnus 2012-07-16
19:38:33 UTC ---
Untested patch:
--- a/gcc/fortran/decl.c
+++ b/gcc/fortran/decl.c
@@ -725,3 +729,3 @@ syntax:
static match
-match_char_length (gfc_expr **expr, bool *deferred)
+match_char_length (g
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52101
--- Comment #9 from Tobias Burnus 2012-02-05
18:11:41 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #8)
> > However, I have just check it and the font size seems to be the normal one.
>
> It is sufficient once one reads B.2.8.
No, it isn't. B.1.8 gives a good h
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52101
--- Comment #8 from Steve Kargl
2012-02-05 18:00:59 UTC ---
On Sun, Feb 05, 2012 at 09:58:46AM +, burnus at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52101
>
> --- Comment #7 from Tobias Burnus 2012-02-05
> 09:58
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52101
--- Comment #7 from Tobias Burnus 2012-02-05
09:58:46 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #4)
> I believe that John is correct. The form 'CHARACTER*n string'
> is obsolescent while the form 'CHARACTER string*n' is not.
After re-checking the standard,
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52101
--- Comment #6 from Steve Kargl
2012-02-04 00:01:08 UTC ---
On Fri, Feb 03, 2012 at 10:46:53PM +, sgk at troutmask dot
apl.washington.edu wrote:
>
> Index: decl.c
> ===
> --- de
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52101
--- Comment #5 from Steve Kargl
2012-02-03 22:46:53 UTC ---
On Fri, Feb 03, 2012 at 09:16:47PM +, kargl at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> I believe that John is correct. The form 'CHARACTER*n string'
> is obsolescent while the form 'CHARACTER stri
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52101
kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
Last reconfirmed|
vuw.ac.nz
> Subject: [Bug fortran/52101] Obsolescence warning for non-obs. feature
> character name*length
>
> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52101
>
> Tobias Burnus changed:
>
> What|R
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52101
--- Comment #2 from Tobias Burnus 2012-02-03
07:30:24 UTC ---
As postscript:
* A program which uses the CHARACTER* declaration is still perfectly valid
Fortran 95/2003/2008. - Thus, you do not have to react on the warning, you
should only avoid
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52101
Tobias Burnus changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
12 matches
Mail list logo
