https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52010
janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||janus at gcc dot gnu.org
Tar
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52010
--- Comment #10 from paul.richard.thomas at gmail dot com ---
Hi Dominique,
I was about to close this one right now :-)
Thanks
Paul
On 18 October 2015 at 22:54, dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52010
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Known to work|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52010
Paul Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||damian at sourceryinstitute
dot or
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52010
Paul Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||pault at gcc dot gnu.org
Assigne
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52010
--- Comment #6 from Fran Martinez Fadrique
2012-01-28 23:09:49 UTC ---
Created attachment 26494
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=26494
Test sample to support comment 5
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52010
--- Comment #5 from Fran Martinez Fadrique
2012-01-28 23:08:46 UTC ---
I have bumped into another problem that I think may be related to this same
topic.
I have an example that generates the following message:
m_pointer_test.f90:22.2:
b%pa =>
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52010
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52010
--- Comment #3 from Tobias Burnus 2012-01-27
16:06:51 UTC ---
The following handles the checking part. However, one also needs to handle the
access internally (in trans-expr.c). Namely:
type_var = class_var
type_var = class_function ()
and bo
