http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50937
--- Comment #11 from fwi at inducks dot org 2011-11-01 12:00:54 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #10)
> Sometimes abstractions leak, unfortunately. There's really not anything
> gfortran can do about that. And, it's not unique to gfortran either. gfort
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50937
--- Comment #10 from Janne Blomqvist 2011-11-01
07:55:06 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #8)
> I indeed do not know everything about the OS and what it does when I
> "allocate"
> an array. But that's exactly the purpose of a programming language li
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50937
--- Comment #9 from Steve Kargl
2011-10-31 21:02:52 UTC ---
On Mon, Oct 31, 2011 at 08:17:51PM +, fwi at inducks dot org wrote:
> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50937
>
> --- Comment #8 from fwi at inducks dot org 2011-10-31 20:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50937
--- Comment #8 from fwi at inducks dot org 2011-10-31 20:17:51 UTC ---
I do not(In reply to comment #7)
> On Mon, Oct 31, 2011 at 07:25:38PM +, fwi at inducks dot org wrote:
> Yes, the problem of integer overflow that Janne mentioned has
> been
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50937
--- Comment #7 from Steve Kargl
2011-10-31 19:50:41 UTC ---
On Mon, Oct 31, 2011 at 07:25:38PM +, fwi at inducks dot org wrote:
>
> Has the bug been corrected in recent versions of gfortran, or do you really
> mean it's OK that gfortran clai
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50937
--- Comment #6 from fwi at inducks dot org 2011-10-31 19:25:38 UTC ---
Has the bug been corrected in recent versions of gfortran, or do you really
mean it's OK that gfortran claims an array has been allocated when it really
has not been?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50937
Janne Blomqvist changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50937
--- Comment #4 from fwi at inducks dot org 2011-10-31 18:29:27 UTC ---
I'm using:
$ gfortran --version
GNU Fortran (Ubuntu 4.4.3-4ubuntu5) 4.4.3
I've now tested the same program on a 64-bit CentOs machine
with 16-Gb RAM, but
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50937
--- Comment #3 from Janne Blomqvist 2011-10-31 18:24:14
UTC ---
>From the metadata, it seems you're using version 4.4.3, where the overflow
check when calculating the size to allocate was a bit stupid. Basically it did
the calculation, and if the
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50937
--- Comment #2 from fwi at inducks dot org 2011-10-31 18:15:57 UTC ---
With "E=1.0D0" instead of "E(N,N,N,N)=1.0D0"
$ gfortran test.f90; for i in `seq -w 10 10 400`; do LANG=C ./a.out $i; done
Sucesfully allocated array of size 10 **4
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50937
kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||kargl at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Co
11 matches
Mail list logo
