https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50221
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||brad.finney at humboldt dot edu
-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50221
Paul Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50221
--- Comment #8 from Paul Thomas ---
Author: pault
Date: Sun Jan 10 18:06:43 2016
New Revision: 232203
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=232203&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2016-01-10 Paul Thomas
Backport from mainline.
PR fortra
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50221
--- Comment #7 from Paul Thomas ---
Author: pault
Date: Sun Nov 15 14:07:52 2015
New Revision: 230396
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=230396&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2015-11-15 Paul Thomas
PR fortran/50221
PR fortran/68216
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50221
Paul Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||pault at gcc dot gnu.org
Assigne
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50221
--- Comment #5 from Dominique d'Humieres ---
Note that the output for comment 0 is
array=xxyyzz 2 3
when compiled with
Using built-in specs.
COLLECT_GCC=/opt/gcc/gcc6a-222042/bin/gfortran
COLLECT_LTO_WRAPPER=/opt/gcc/gcc6
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50221
Arjen Markus changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||arjen.markus895 at gmail dot
com
--- Com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50221
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||wrong-code
Status|UNCO
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50221
--- Comment #2 from Tobias Burnus 2012-05-12
12:10:33 UTC ---
The following program illustrates some of the problems:
a) If the comment lines are removed (i.e. a module is used), there is no
valgrind failure and the result is correct. (Note: It
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50221
Tobias Burnus changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1
10 matches
Mail list logo
