[Bug fortran/48718] gfortran crash

2011-07-24 Thread burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48718 Tobias Burnus changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug fortran/48718] gfortran crash

2011-07-24 Thread burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48718 --- Comment #4 from Tobias Burnus 2011-07-24 19:50:31 UTC --- (In reply to comment #3) > (In reply to comment #2) > > Works with -fno-realloc-lhs -- thus, it should be one of the recently fixed > > 4.6/4.7 regressions. > Can this be closed, then?

[Bug fortran/48718] gfortran crash

2011-07-24 Thread dfranke at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48718 Daniel Franke changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Last reconfirmed|

[Bug fortran/48718] gfortran crash

2011-04-22 Thread burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48718 Tobias Burnus changed: What|Removed |Added CC||burnus at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #2

[Bug fortran/48718] gfortran crash

2011-04-21 Thread dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48718 --- Comment #1 from Dominique d'Humieres 2011-04-21 22:55:33 UTC --- On x86_64-apple-darwin10 I get the segmentation fault with 4.6 r169227 and 170921, but not with trunk r172845 nor with 4.5.2.