http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47984
--- Comment #6 from Thomas Henlich
2011-03-07 06:26:24 UTC ---
RTFM, I should have.
Thank you for your help.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47984
--- Comment #5 from Tobias Burnus 2011-03-04
19:39:32 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #3)
> Sorry, I don't understand why you consider the bug report invalid.
> You may very well be correct, but please explain. I am not such a
> Fortran expert, so I
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47984
--- Comment #4 from Steve Kargl
2011-03-04 19:16:27 UTC ---
On Fri, Mar 04, 2011 at 06:58:19PM +, thenlich at users dot sourceforge.net
wrote:
> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47984
>
> --- Comment #3 from Thomas Henlich
> 201
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47984
--- Comment #3 from Thomas Henlich
2011-03-04 18:58:06 UTC ---
Sorry, I don't understand why you consider the bug report invalid. You may very
well be correct, but please explain. I am not such a Fortran expert, so I may
have missed something her
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47984
Tobias Burnus changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47984
kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||kargl at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Co
