http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46982
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46982
--- Comment #5 from Harald Anlauf ---
(In reply to Dominique d'Humieres from comment #4)
> > ... So I think that the code in comment #0 is not legal.
>
> Then, should not this PR closed as INVALID?
Yes, close as INVALID.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46982
--- Comment #4 from Dominique d'Humieres ---
> ... So I think that the code in comment #0 is not legal.
Then, should not this PR closed as INVALID?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46982
Harald Anlauf changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||anlauf at gmx dot de
--- Comment #3 from
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46982
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46982
kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||kargl at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Co