http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46818
Paul Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46818
--- Comment #7 from Paul Thomas 2011-02-20 17:00:50
UTC ---
Author: pault
Date: Sun Feb 20 17:00:47 2011
New Revision: 170338
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=170338
Log:
2011-02-20 Paul Thomas
PR fortran/46818
*
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46818
--- Comment #6 from bur...@net-b.de 2010-12-29 10:55:11 UTC
---
(In reply to comment #5)
> It seems that we have another TYPE_CANONICAL problem.
Kind of. The problem (for this PR and for PR 46818) is that one only
generates a gsym for a MODULE;
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46818
Paul Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||pault at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #5 fro
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46818
--- Comment #4 from Dominique d'Humieres 2010-12-06
13:49:25 UTC ---
> Well, then it is probably in a way a duplicate of PR 44945 => Mark this PR as
> depending on PR 44945.
I don't think it is a duplicate of PR 44945, the failure is the same t
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46818
Tobias Burnus changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends on||44945
Summary|[4.6 Regression]
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46818
--- Comment #2 from Dominique d'Humieres 2010-12-06
13:26:42 UTC ---
The test in comment #1 compiles with -fno-whole-file, so the regression comes
from -fwhole-file being the default (compiles with r162456, ICE with r166102).
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46818
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
Known to work|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46818
Tobias Burnus changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Known to work|
