http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46201
--- Comment #9 from Dominique d'Humieres 2010-12-13
22:13:32 UTC ---
> Sure, they're not meant to be runtime tests.
I just wanted to be sure that I had understood the problem. Thanks
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46201
--- Comment #8 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-12-13 21:51:49 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #7)
> The tests in comments #2 and #3 compile now but segfault at run-time. Am I
> right to say that they are invalid because the pointers point to nowher
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46201
--- Comment #7 from Dominique d'Humieres 2010-12-13
21:38:49 UTC ---
The tests in comments #2 and #3 compile now but segfault at run-time. Am I
right to say that they are invalid because the pointers point to nowhere?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46201
janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46201
--- Comment #5 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-12-13 19:18:08 UTC ---
Author: janus
Date: Mon Dec 13 19:17:46 2010
New Revision: 167767
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=167767
Log:
2010-12-13 Janus Weil
PR fortran/4
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46201
janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
AssignedTo|una
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46201
--- Comment #3 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-12-13 16:57:20 UTC ---
Here is an even more compact version of the test case (getting rid of the
INTERFACE statement):
type t
procedure(character), nopass, pointer :: ppc
end type
type(t),dimens
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46201
janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
