http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46067
janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46067
--- Comment #9 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-10-21 09:25:24 UTC ---
Author: janus
Date: Thu Oct 21 09:25:17 2010
New Revision: 165755
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=165755
Log:
2010-10-21 Janus Weil
PR fortran/4
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46067
--- Comment #8 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-10-21 07:59:37 UTC ---
Note: Both of the test cases in comment #6 and #7 are invalid but accepted by
current trunk builds (as well as 4.5). However, they are rejected with the
patch in comment #5, w
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46067
--- Comment #7 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-10-21 07:54:43 UTC ---
And here is yet another variant, which uses a procedure as actual argument to
another procedure (instead of procedure pointers). Same symptoms
(accepts-invalid).
module m
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46067
--- Comment #6 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-10-21 07:51:37 UTC ---
Here is a variant of the test case in comment #3 which uses plain procedure
pointers instead of PPCs (and avoids recursive I/O):
implicit none
type test_type
intege
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46067
janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46067
--- Comment #4 from Dominique d'Humieres 2010-10-18
21:31:54 UTC ---
Beware the INVALID recursive IOs: they hang on darwin!-(see pr 30617).
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46067
--- Comment #3 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-10-18 21:29:31 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #1)
> > potential problem 2: if the error message is correct and if the type of the
> > passed-object dummy argument in the sample code is changed from a
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46067
janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||accepts-invalid
Summ
