https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45128
Francois-Xavier Coudert changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45128
Daniel Franke changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dfranke at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #5
--- Comment #4 from paul dot richard dot thomas at gmail dot com
2010-08-15 16:32 ---
Subject: Re: Segmentation fault with -fwhole-file for subref_array_pointer
Dear Jerry,
> --- Comment #3 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-08-09 17:18
> ---
> Paul, can you send m
--- Comment #3 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-08-09 17:18
---
Paul, can you send me a preview of the new descriptor structure so I can be
planning the internal unit I/O impacts if any.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45128
--- Comment #2 from paul dot richard dot thomas at gmail dot com
2010-08-09 10:50 ---
Subject: Re: Segmentation fault with -fwhole-file for
subref_array_pointer
Dear Tobias,
> If one now recycles the definition for the array descriptor "desc" this
> information is not presen
--- Comment #1 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-07-29 14:44 ---
Carry over the comment from PR 45125, where I had posted it initially (and
accidentally).
The segfault occurs for:
l.4768 gfc_add_modify (&lse.post, GFC_DECL_SPAN(decl), tmp);
It seems as if GFC_DECL_SP
