--- Comment #12 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-07-20 01:10
---
Fixed, thanks for report.
--
jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #11 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-07-19 13:12
---
Subject: Bug 44953
Author: jvdelisle
Date: Mon Jul 19 13:11:54 2010
New Revision: 162304
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=162304
Log:
2010-07-19 Jerry DeLisle
PR libfortran/4495
--- Comment #10 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-07-18 22:19
---
Full regression test passed on IBM Power 5. I will submit patch for approval
this evening. Thanks for bug report and testing.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44953
--- Comment #9 from dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr 2010-07-18 21:59 ---
> Created an attachment (id=21245)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=21245&action=view) [edit]
> Proposed Patch
>
> Please test the attached patch.
make -k check-gfortran RUNTESTFLAGS="dg.exp=char4
--- Comment #8 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-07-18 21:07
---
Created an attachment (id=21245)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=21245&action=view)
Proposed Patch
Please test the attached patch. This patch cleans up pointer use and adds a
few snippets I m
--- Comment #7 from dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr 2010-07-16 09:03 ---
> Dominique, can you do me a favor and test the READ patch as well that I
> submitted to see if the issue is there as well. I suspect it is.
Yes!-(
FAIL: gfortran.dg/char4_iunit_1.f03 -O0 execution test
FAIL: g
--- Comment #6 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-07-16 07:31
---
I am able to reproduce this on the PPC machine I have access to. I think I see
the problem and will submit a patch in the next few days when I can squeeze in
some time.
Dominique, can you do me a favor and test
--- Comment #5 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-07-16 06:44
---
I am attempting a build on a PPC machine to see if I can fix this. I suspect I
am missing a few casts in the right places.
--
jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed
--- Comment #4 from danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-07-16 01:01 ---
Also in hppa64-hp-hpux11.11.
--
danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #3 from dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr 2010-07-15 19:35 ---
If I print the different strings, I get:
abcdefg
? 12345
78932 123456 abc
??
--- Comment #2 from dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr 2010-07-15 19:21 ---
>From http://gcc.gnu.org/regtest/HEAD/native-lastbuild.txt.gzip , I think the
failures on regress come after a clean bootstrap as well as my build for
r162194.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44953
--- Comment #1 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-07-15 19:08
---
You do have to make sure you do a clean build. I noticed some dependency
issues while developing the patch. I am not sure it was io.h or
write_float.def. Regardless, check that first and I will touch base with
12 matches
Mail list logo
