--- Comment #7 from domob at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-07-23 09:55 ---
Fixed.
--
domob at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED
--- Comment #6 from domob at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-07-23 09:53 ---
Subject: Bug 44709
Author: domob
Date: Fri Jul 23 09:53:45 2010
New Revision: 162450
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=162450
Log:
2010-07-23 Daniel Kraft
PR fortran/44709
* gf
--- Comment #5 from domob at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-07-15 12:31 ---
Fixed the clean-up issues. Still remaining is the rejects-valid (2b) of
Tobias' original comment. I'll keep on with that.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44709
--- Comment #4 from domob at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-07-15 12:24 ---
Subject: Bug 44709
Author: domob
Date: Thu Jul 15 12:23:47 2010
New Revision: 162219
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=162219
Log:
2010-07-15 Daniel Kraft
PR fortran/44709
* tr
--- Comment #3 from domob at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-07-07 13:05 ---
See http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2010-07/msg00058.html.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44709
--- Comment #2 from domob at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-07-04 11:48 ---
Mine.
--
domob at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned at
--- Comment #1 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-06-29 20:03 ---
As pointed out by Andrew: One should follow C++ and generate try {} finally{}
blocks (TRY_FINALLY_EXPR).
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44709
