https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44596
janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.6.0
--- Comment #21 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-07-13 10:01 ---
(In reply to comment #19)
> > Paul, thanks for the check in. Do you plan to backport it to 4.5, which
> > sems to use the same code?
>
> Yes, I could do that on Thursday, when I am back in Barcelona. I do
> not hav
--- Comment #20 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-07-11 17:45 ---
(In reply to comment #19)
> Subject: Re: [OOP] Dynamic dispatch uses broken types
>
> Dear Tobias,
>
> > Paul, thanks for the check in. Do you plan to backport it to 4.5, which
> > sems to
> > use the same code?
--- Comment #19 from paul dot richard dot thomas at gmail dot com
2010-07-06 15:28 ---
Subject: Re: [OOP] Dynamic dispatch uses broken types
Dear Tobias,
> Paul, thanks for the check in. Do you plan to backport it to 4.5, which sems
> to
> use the same code?
Yes, I could do that on
--- Comment #18 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-07-06 15:20 ---
Paul, thanks for the check in. Do you plan to backport it to 4.5, which sems to
use the same code?
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44596
--- Comment #17 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-07-05 19:26 ---
Subject: Bug 44596
Author: pault
Date: Mon Jul 5 19:26:12 2010
New Revision: 161848
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=161848
Log:
2010-07-05 Paul Thomas
PR fortran/44596
* tr
--- Comment #16 from paul dot richard dot thomas at gmail dot com
2010-07-05 15:47 ---
Subject: Re: [OOP] Dynamic dispatch uses broken types
> --- Comment #15 from rguenther at suse dot de 2010-07-05 14:06 ---
Now I take a look at build_pointer_type_for_mode and it's uses in
--- Comment #15 from rguenther at suse dot de 2010-07-05 14:06 ---
Subject: Re: [OOP] Dynamic dispatch uses broken types
On Mon, 5 Jul 2010, paul dot richard dot thomas at gmail dot com wrote:
> --- Comment #14 from paul dot richard dot thomas at gmail dot com
> 2010-07-05 13:52
--- Comment #14 from paul dot richard dot thomas at gmail dot com
2010-07-05 13:52 ---
Subject: Re: [OOP] Dynamic dispatch uses broken types
On Mon, Jul 5, 2010 at 3:14 PM, burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org
wrote:
> Thanks for checking, Richard!
Indeed, seconded by me.
Is there anywhe
--- Comment #13 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-07-05 13:14 ---
(In reply to comment #12)
> You shouldn't change bits in (shared) types. Instead do
>
> field_type = build_pointer_type_for_mode
> (field_type, ptr_mode,
> c->ts.type == BT_DERIVED
--- Comment #12 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-07-05 12:32
---
field_type = build_pointer_type (field_type);
+ /* vtype fields can point to different types to the base type. */
+ if (c->ts.type == BT_DERIVED && c->ts.u.derived->attr.vtype)
+ TYPE_REF_
--- Comment #11 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-07-04 14:40 ---
Subject: Bug 44596
Author: pault
Date: Sun Jul 4 14:40:34 2010
New Revision: 161801
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=161801
Log:
2010-07-04 Paul Thomas
PR fortran/44596
PR f
--- Comment #10 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-07-01 18:27 ---
(In reply to comment #9)
> (In reply to comment #8)
I'm on the road for a few days - I'll update the tree on my laptop and see what
I can do :-)
Cheers
Paul
--
pault at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
--- Comment #9 from dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr 2010-07-01 15:57 ---
(In reply to comment #8)
> > This may be a duplicate of pr44662. Could you try the patch in
> > http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44662#c2 ?
>
> It is not.
Agreed for this pr (and pr44745 is a duplicate). H
--- Comment #8 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-07-01 14:34 ---
(In reply to comment #7)
> This may be a duplicate of pr44662. Could you try the patch in
> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44662#c2 ?
It is not.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44596
--- Comment #7 from dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr 2010-07-01 14:25 ---
This may be a duplicate of pr44662. Could you try the patch in
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44662#c2 ?
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44596
--- Comment #6 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-07-01 14:22 ---
*** Bug 44746 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44596
--- Comment #5 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-07-01 14:21 ---
*** Bug 44745 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
---
--- Comment #4 from paul dot richard dot thomas at gmail dot com
2010-06-23 17:36 ---
Subject: Re: [OOP] Dynamic dispatch uses broken types
Tobias,
On Tue, Jun 22, 2010 at 5:00 PM, burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org
wrote:
>
>
> --- Comment #2 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010
--- Comment #3 from paul dot richard dot thomas at gmail dot com
2010-06-22 19:15 ---
Subject: Re: [OOP] Dynamic dispatch uses broken types
Dear Tobias,
> --- Comment #2 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-06-22 15:00
> ---
> CC Paul as he might have an idea how to hand
--- Comment #2 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-06-22 15:00 ---
CC Paul as he might have an idea how to handle it (cf. comment 1).
BTW: The mem-ref2 branch (cf. http://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/MemRef ) will be merged
soon.
--
burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What
21 matches
Mail list logo
