[Bug fortran/44471] Wrong call with variadic declaration

2019-03-03 Thread tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44471 Thomas Koenig changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/44471] Wrong call with variadic declaration

2011-03-25 Thread burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44471 --- Comment #6 from Tobias Burnus 2011-03-25 18:18:22 UTC --- See also PR 33097 and PR 40976. Try also the program at http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2010-05/msg00330.html to make sure it still works.

[Bug fortran/44471] Wrong call with variadic declaration

2010-08-17 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #5 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-08-17 09:51 --- The #c2 patch is problematic, because build_function_type shares function types, so setting TYPE_ARG_TYPES on that I'm afraid will affect all functions with (...) arguments and the same return type. So, the arglist ne

[Bug fortran/44471] Wrong call with variadic declaration

2010-08-17 Thread burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #4 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-08-17 09:35 --- Cf. PR 45304 for a partial fix. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44471

[Bug fortran/44471] Wrong call with variadic declaration

2010-06-12 Thread burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #3 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-06-12 07:12 --- (In reply to comment #2) > It is possible to get the front-end to construct a real argument types list > from the arguments list of the external call, as is done in the patch > attached. I think doing so is the prop

[Bug fortran/44471] Wrong call with variadic declaration

2010-06-11 Thread fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #2 from fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-06-11 22:17 --- Created an attachment (id=20899) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=20899&action=view) Possible patch OK, maybe I came out too strong in my last comment. It is possible to get the front-end to c

[Bug fortran/44471] Wrong call with variadic declaration

2010-06-11 Thread fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #1 from fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-06-11 21:55 --- We generate a variadic prototype for the decl when calling bar because we try to generate it anew, instead of finding the toplevel decl already existing. This is (again) the multiple decls issue. (Well, we could