[Bug fortran/43948] Valid generic procedure interface rejected

2010-04-30 Thread kargl at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #5 from kargl at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-04-30 17:28 --- (In reply to comment #4) > (In reply to comment #3) > > Any chance to convert the code in comment #1 into a testcase? > > > > laptop:kargl[205] grep "already present" *c > > laptop:kargl[206] grep "already" *c > > lap

[Bug fortran/43948] Valid generic procedure interface rejected

2010-04-30 Thread burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #4 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-04-30 17:17 --- (In reply to comment #3) > Any chance to convert the code in comment #1 into a testcase? > > laptop:kargl[205] grep "already present" *c > laptop:kargl[206] grep "already" *c > laptop:kargl[207] grep "Entity" *c I t

[Bug fortran/43948] Valid generic procedure interface rejected

2010-04-30 Thread kargl at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #3 from kargl at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-04-30 16:53 --- (In reply to comment #2) > Found the latest version (thanks Bill!): > http://j3-fortran.org/doc/year/10/10-006A.txt > > It clearly states that it is invalid. > > (In reply to comment #1) > > Fortran 2003 (j3/04-007)

[Bug fortran/43948] Valid generic procedure interface rejected

2010-04-30 Thread burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #2 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-04-30 16:43 --- Found the latest version (thanks Bill!): http://j3-fortran.org/doc/year/10/10-006A.txt It clearly states that it is invalid. (In reply to comment #1) > Fortran 2003 (j3/04-007) only has C1209 in "Annex D": Actually

[Bug fortran/43948] Valid generic procedure interface rejected

2010-04-30 Thread burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #1 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-04-30 16:02 --- Maybe this is wrong. The edit ends with: Remove C1209 from 12.3.2.1. HISTORY: 04-406m170 Submitted 04-406r1 m170 Passed J3 meeting 05-146m171 Passed J3 letter ballot #10 Fortran 2003 (j