--- Comment #13 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-04-29 19:11 ---
Subject: Bug 43326
Author: pault
Date: Thu Apr 29 19:10:48 2010
New Revision: 158910
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=158910
Log:
2010-04-29 Janus Weil
PR fortran/43896
* sym
--- Comment #12 from dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr 2010-04-21 17:09 ---
> thanks for the reminder, Dominique
You're welcome!-)
Just another one: modulo spaces(?)
gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/dynamic_dispatch_7.f03 in trunk and
gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/dynamic_dispatch_9.f03 in fortran-de
--- Comment #11 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-04-21 16:51 ---
Fixed on fortran-dev.
Thanks, as usual, for the report, Janus, and thanks for the reminder, Dominique
:-)
Paul
--
pault at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
---
--- Comment #10 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-04-21 16:50 ---
Subject: Bug 43326
Author: pault
Date: Wed Apr 21 16:49:28 2010
New Revision: 158613
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=158613
Log:
2010-04-21 Paul Thomas
PR fortran/43326
* re
--- Comment #9 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-04-21 14:29 ---
Created an attachment (id=20453)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=20453&action=view)
Version of fix for fortran-dev
This hasn been fully bootstrapped but runs gfortran.dg/dynamic*, proc* and
class*
--- Comment #8 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-04-21 04:53 ---
I'll do this one next - assigning to self.
Paul
--
pault at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #7 from dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr 2010-04-20 19:17 ---
> Thanks for the heads up on this - I had completely forgotten this PR.
I was suspecting something like that;-)
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43326
--- Comment #6 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-04-20 18:57 ---
(In reply to comment #5)
> (In reply to comment #4)
> > Technically this PR, fixed on trunk but not on fortran-dev, is now a
> > [fortran-dev Regression]. Could it be marked that way?
>
> Yes.
>
Janus and Dominique,
--- Comment #5 from janus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-04-20 12:26 ---
(In reply to comment #4)
> Technically this PR, fixed on trunk but not on fortran-dev, is now a
> [fortran-dev Regression]. Could it be marked that way?
Yes.
--
janus at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
Wh
