--- Comment #15 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-08-27 15:01
---
Dominique, thanks for testing that.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43217
--- Comment #14 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-08-27 15:00
---
Subject: Bug 43217
Author: jvdelisle
Date: Fri Aug 27 15:00:11 2010
New Revision: 163588
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=163588
Log:
2010-08-27 Jerry DeLisle
PR libfortran/4321
--- Comment #13 from dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr 2010-08-27 14:48 ---
The following test
! { dg-do run )
program hello2
call wrtout (9hHELLO YOU, 9)
stop
end
subroutine wrtout (iarray, nchrs)
integer(1), parameter :: zero = 0
LOGICAL, PARAMETER :: bigend = IACHAR(TRANSFER(1,"
--- Comment #12 from dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr 2010-08-27 14:20 ---
On ppc, the original test gives before patch
48454C4C 4F20594F 5500
So it seems that the test is likely to fail on ppc.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43217
--- Comment #11 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-08-27 14:02
---
Dominiq, can you test the output of the test case for me on PPC?
hollerith8.f90 in the gfortran post.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43217
--- Comment #10 from dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr 2010-08-27 10:23 ---
I think the test case has not been committed.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43217
--- Comment #9 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-08-27 07:26 ---
Close as FIXED (on the 4.6 trunk).
Thanks for fixing it, Jerry!
--
burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
--- Comment #8 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-08-27 06:50
---
Subject: Bug 43217
Author: jvdelisle
Date: Fri Aug 27 06:50:03 2010
New Revision: 163581
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=163581
Log:
2010-08-27 Jerry DeLisle
PR fortran/43217
--- Comment #7 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-08-21 16:42
---
Created an attachment (id=21539)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=21539&action=view)
Proposed patch
This patch adds the padding requested. Output of test case matches a few of the
other compile
--- Comment #6 from kargl at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-03-04 03:15 ---
(In reply to comment #5)
> Tobias,
>
> If you have a fix in mind, you are welcome to take this. I am going to work
> the namelist bug first.
>
Just close the report. Using Hollerith in 2010 is a less than
smart i
--- Comment #5 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-03-04 03:08
---
Tobias,
If you have a fix in mind, you are welcome to take this. I am going to work
the namelist bug first.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43217
--- Comment #4 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-03-02 09:50 ---
For DATA gfortran already pads the Hollerith constant; maybe the simplest would
be to modify primary.c's match_hollerith_constant to simply add tailing spaces
such that the length is multiples of the storage size of,
--- Comment #3 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-03-01 15:37 ---
I now check the standard.
a) Hollerith constants (not H... in FORMAT) are deleted in Fortran 77, but they
were allowed in Fortran 66. F77 "A.2 Conflicts with ANSI X3.9-1966" has:
"Hollerith constants and Hollerith da
--- Comment #2 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-03-01 14:31
---
You folks think of the crazy stuff :) I will check into this.
--
jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
-
--- Comment #1 from dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr 2010-03-01 10:29 ---
> I wonder what happens with g77.
[ibook-dhum] f90/bug% g77 pr43217.f
[ibook-dhum] f90/bug% a.out
HELLO YOU
:HELLO YOU :
4C4C4548 4F59204F 955
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=432
15 matches
Mail list logo
