https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43210
--- Comment #11 from Dominique d'Humieres ---
I still see
...
_hugearray.3858:
.long 42
.long 42
.long 42
...
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43210
--- Comment #10 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Tue Feb 26 10:36:05 2019
New Revision: 269207
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=269207&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR fortran/43210
* trans-array.c (gfc_conv_array_initiali
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43210
--- Comment #9 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Created attachment 45818
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=45818&action=edit
gcc9-pr43210.patch
Like this (untested so far).
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43210
--- Comment #8 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Well, I'm not convinced the #c0 transformation should be done by default, but
what should and can be done is instead of emitting {42, 42, 42, , 42}; emit
like the C or C++ FEs emit {[1..100] = 42} whi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43210
--- Comment #7 from Dominique d'Humieres ---
> This is definitely an area where improvement would be quite helpful -
> our performance there is abysmal.
Compiling the test on my laptop takes less than 3s!
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43210
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|NEW
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43210
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43210
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |WAITING
--- Comment #4 from Domin
--- Comment #3 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-03-27 18:47 ---
Confirmed
Paul
--
pault at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCO
--- Comment #2 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-03-20 20:19
---
See fortran-exp branch where we are working these issues. Once the splay-tree
structure is in place we can then focus on setting a limit and not "simplify"
the constructor.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/sho
--- Comment #1 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-02-28 15:02 ---
A bonus: There should be only a single "logical initialized" variable for all
initializers.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43210
11 matches
Mail list logo