[Bug fortran/43210] Initializer of huge static arrays should be improved

2019-03-03 Thread dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43210 --- Comment #11 from Dominique d'Humieres --- I still see ... _hugearray.3858: .long 42 .long 42 .long 42 ...

[Bug fortran/43210] Initializer of huge static arrays should be improved

2019-02-26 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43210 --- Comment #10 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Tue Feb 26 10:36:05 2019 New Revision: 269207 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=269207&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR fortran/43210 * trans-array.c (gfc_conv_array_initiali

[Bug fortran/43210] Initializer of huge static arrays should be improved

2019-02-25 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43210 --- Comment #9 from Jakub Jelinek --- Created attachment 45818 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=45818&action=edit gcc9-pr43210.patch Like this (untested so far).

[Bug fortran/43210] Initializer of huge static arrays should be improved

2019-02-25 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43210 --- Comment #8 from Jakub Jelinek --- Well, I'm not convinced the #c0 transformation should be done by default, but what should and can be done is instead of emitting {42, 42, 42, , 42}; emit like the C or C++ FEs emit {[1..100] = 42} whi

[Bug fortran/43210] Initializer of huge static arrays should be improved

2019-02-25 Thread dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43210 --- Comment #7 from Dominique d'Humieres --- > This is definitely an area where improvement would be quite helpful - > our performance there is abysmal. Compiling the test on my laptop takes less than 3s!

[Bug fortran/43210] Initializer of huge static arrays should be improved

2019-02-25 Thread tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43210 Thomas Koenig changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|NEW CC|

[Bug fortran/43210] Initializer of huge static arrays should be improved

2019-02-25 Thread dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43210 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/43210] Initializer of huge static arrays should be improved

2019-01-15 Thread dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43210 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |WAITING --- Comment #4 from Domin

[Bug fortran/43210] Initializer of huge static arrays should be improved

2010-03-27 Thread pault at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #3 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-03-27 18:47 --- Confirmed Paul -- pault at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCO

[Bug fortran/43210] Initializer of huge static arrays should be improved

2010-03-20 Thread jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #2 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-03-20 20:19 --- See fortran-exp branch where we are working these issues. Once the splay-tree structure is in place we can then focus on setting a limit and not "simplify" the constructor. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/sho

[Bug fortran/43210] Initializer of huge static arrays should be improved

2010-02-28 Thread burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #1 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-02-28 15:02 --- A bonus: There should be only a single "logical initialized" variable for all initializers. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43210