[Bug fortran/42772] [4.5 Regression] ICE at fold-const.c:10033

2010-01-19 Thread pault at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #8 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-01-19 19:49 --- I believe that the commit in comment #7 fixes it. If not, please get in touch. Thanks for the report Paul -- pault at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug fortran/42772] [4.5 Regression] ICE at fold-const.c:10033

2010-01-19 Thread pault at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #7 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-01-19 19:47 --- Subject: Bug 42772 Author: pault Date: Tue Jan 19 19:46:59 2010 New Revision: 156046 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=156046 Log: 2010-01-19 Paul Thomas PR fortran/42783 * tra

[Bug fortran/42772] [4.5 Regression] ICE at fold-const.c:10033

2010-01-18 Thread pault at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #6 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-01-19 06:04 --- Ah, I was being stupid; now I see what test case 2 actually is. duuh, I did not think to go to comment #10! My patch that was just posted does indeed fix this, so I'll take it on. Thanks for the report. Paul --

[Bug fortran/42772] [4.5 Regression] ICE at fold-const.c:10033

2010-01-18 Thread pault at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #5 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-01-18 19:55 --- Index: gcc/fortran/trans-decl.c === *** gcc/fortran/trans-decl.c(revision 155875) --- gcc/fortran/trans-decl.c(working copy) *** gfc_g

[Bug fortran/42772] [4.5 Regression] ICE at fold-const.c:10033

2010-01-17 Thread burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #4 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-01-17 08:48 --- (In reply to comment #3) > It is cause by revision 155606: Thus mark as regression. -- burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added ---