https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42693
markeggleston at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Stat
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42693
--- Comment #6 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Mark Eggleston
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:d57bf2315e024ada3393ad967e8f632121383c9c
commit r11-1583-gd57bf2315e024ada3393ad967e8f632121383c9c
Author: Mark Eggleston
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42693
--- Comment #5 from Göran Uddeborg ---
(In reply to markeggleston from comment #4)
> Does this mean that this is fixed?
I don't think so. The "_" define typically marks the string for translation,
but it doesn't add the information this is a fo
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42693
markeggleston at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||markeggleston at gcc do
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42693
Tobias Burnus changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
Blo
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42693
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
--- Comment #1 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-01-11 22:29 ---
Confirm. One possibility would be to modify
gcc/po/exgettext
to recognize %L -- while a simple hack would be to use:
--- arith.c (Revision 155812)
+++ arith.c
@@ -91,6 +91,7 @@
switch (code)
{
case
