--
hjl dot tools at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.3.4
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42422
--- Comment #6 from tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-12-21 23:14 ---
Test case committed to trund and 4.4 branch.
Closing.
--
tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
--- Comment #5 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-12-20 20:57
---
Thomas, let me know if you want me to do the test case.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42422
--- Comment #4 from kargl at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-12-20 20:33 ---
(In reply to comment #3)
> I can confirm this works on all supported versions.
>
> Should we add a test case, then close this bug?
>
IMHO. Yes.
A new testcase is pre-approved provided it passes a
regression test.
--- Comment #3 from tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-12-20 20:17 ---
I can confirm this works on all supported versions.
Should we add a test case, then close this bug?
--
tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #2 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-12-18 10:07 ---
Hmm, I cannot reproduce this with newer gfortran version. Using 4.2.1 I also
get:
1 2 3 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
however, already with 4.3.4 [gcc-4_3-branch revision 152973] I get:
1 2 3 5 5 5 5 0 0 0 0 0
--- Comment #1 from palmtag5 at yahoo dot com 2009-12-18 02:54 ---
Full example:
program test2
implicit none
integer :: imatr(20)
imatr=0
write (*,*) 'Enter 20 integer values:'
read (*,*) imatr
write (*,*) 'results:'
write (*,*) imatr
