--- Comment #12 from paul dot richard dot thomas at gmail dot com
2010-02-16 11:01 ---
Subject: Re: ICE segfault when reading module file
Aahhh... thanks, I was going to attend to it myself.
Well thank you for the report :-)
Paul
On Tue, Feb 16, 2010 at 11:53 AM, burnus at gcc dot
--- Comment #11 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-02-16 10:53 ---
... and FIXED it myself.
Thanks again for the fix, Paul. (I refrain from thanking myself for reporting
the bug ;-)
--
burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Adde
--- Comment #10 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-02-16 10:51 ---
Subject: Bug 41869
Author: burnus
Date: Tue Feb 16 10:50:56 2010
New Revision: 156799
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=156799
Log:
2010-02-16 Paul Thomas
PR fortran/41869
*
--- Comment #9 from paul dot richard dot thomas at gmail dot com
2010-02-16 08:59 ---
Subject: Re: ICE segfault when reading module file
> Ditto. (Don't forget "gfc_symbol *sym;" as I did in my posted patch as I
> failed
> to split three patches correctly.)
***grin***
OK - Paul
-
--- Comment #8 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-02-16 07:39 ---
(In reply to comment #7)
> Do we backport to 4.4 or just close it? I would go for the backporting.
Ditto. (Don't forget "gfc_symbol *sym;" as I did in my posted patch as I failed
to split three patches correctly.)
--- Comment #7 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-02-15 11:57 ---
Since Tobias and I already did the business on trunk, I suppose that one of us
should take ownership of it.
Do we backport to 4.4 or just close it? I would go for the backporting.
Paul
--
pault at gcc dot gnu do
--- Comment #6 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-02-09 17:33 ---
Subject: Bug 41869
Author: burnus
Date: Tue Feb 9 17:32:53 2010
New Revision: 156631
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=156631
Log:
2010-02-09 Paul Thomas
PR fortran/41869
* m
--- Comment #5 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-02-08 18:19 ---
Please excuse the lack of a diff - I was using a snap shot to work on this PR.
This fixes the problem but I do not know if it regtests; however, I believe it
to be good. If somebody wants to take it to completion, pl
--- Comment #4 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-02-05 16:28 ---
(In reply to comment #3)
> Subject: Re: ICE segfault when reading module file
>
> Tobias,
>
> I'll give it some thought at lunchtime.
I did give it some thought but got interrupted in writing my reply.
As long as
--- Comment #3 from paul dot richard dot thomas at gmail dot com
2010-02-04 05:33 ---
Subject: Re: ICE segfault when reading module file
Tobias,
I'll give it some thought at lunchtime.
Cheers
Paul
On Wed, Feb 3, 2010 at 9:40 PM, burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org
wrote:
>
>
> ---
--- Comment #2 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-02-03 20:40 ---
Paul, maybe you have an idea how to solve this best.
One has two modules, (1) one defines "vs_str" and the other (2) defines
interface
module procedure len
end interface
PRIVATE :: len
(and a public inter
--- Comment #1 from dfranke at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-12-06 15:18 ---
Slightly reduced testcase:
module fox_m_fsys_array_str
contains
pure function str_vs(vs) result(s)
character, dimension(:), intent(in) :: vs
character(len=size(vs)) :: s
end function str_vs
pure functi
12 matches
Mail list logo
