[Bug fortran/41823] gcc/fortran/trans-openmp.c: possible null pointer dereference

2013-12-17 Thread dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41823 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/41823] gcc/fortran/trans-openmp.c: possible null pointer dereference

2012-01-24 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41823 --- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek 2012-01-24 13:18:18 UTC --- It is not, but it isn't that a big deal, gcc will optimize the test away.

[Bug fortran/41823] gcc/fortran/trans-openmp.c: possible null pointer dereference

2012-01-24 Thread dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41823 --- Comment #3 from Dominique d'Humieres 2012-01-24 11:09:05 UTC --- > It is guaranteed to be non-NULL for omp parallel/do/task and many others, see > the ew_st.ext.omp_clauses = something lines in openmp.c. Then is the 'if (clauses)' necessary?

[Bug fortran/41823] gcc/fortran/trans-openmp.c: possible null pointer dereference

2012-01-24 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41823 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #2 f

[Bug fortran/41823] gcc/fortran/trans-openmp.c: possible null pointer dereference

2012-01-24 Thread dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41823 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at redhat dot com --- Commen