https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41706
janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.5.0
--- Comment #7 from janus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-10-21 09:01 ---
Fixed with r153049. Closing.
--
janus at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #6 from janus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-10-21 08:57 ---
Subject: Bug 41706
Author: janus
Date: Wed Oct 21 08:56:56 2009
New Revision: 153049
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=153049
Log:
2009-10-21 Janus Weil
PR fortran/41706
PR for
--- Comment #5 from janus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-10-20 12:29 ---
(In reply to comment #4)
> Oh bother! I completely forgot to test the subroutine branch - thanks Janus
But in your patch you do the argument resolution both in resolve_class_compcall
and resolve_class_typebound_call,
--- Comment #4 from paul dot richard dot thomas at gmail dot com
2009-10-20 12:19 ---
Subject: Re: [OOP] Calling one TBP as an actual argument
of another TBP
Oh bother! I completely forgot to test the subroutine branch - thanks Janus
On Tue, Oct 20, 2009 at 1:30 PM, janus a
--- Comment #3 from janus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-10-20 11:30 ---
Reopening. Salvatore's code still fails with the same error, which is due to
the analogous case with a subroutine:
module m
type :: t
contains
procedure, nopass :: a
procedure, nopass :: b
end type
contains
s
--- Comment #2 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-10-20 04:52 ---
Fixed on trunk.
Thanks for the report!
Paul
--
pault at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
---
--- Comment #1 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-10-20 04:17 ---
Subject: Bug 41706
Author: pault
Date: Tue Oct 20 04:16:02 2009
New Revision: 153004
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=153004
Log:
2009-10-20 Paul Thomas
PR fortran/41706
* res
