--- Comment #6 from janus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-10-19 19:23 ---
Fixed with r152988. Closing.
--
janus at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #5 from janus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-10-19 19:21 ---
Subject: Bug 41586
Author: janus
Date: Mon Oct 19 19:21:18 2009
New Revision: 152988
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=152988
Log:
2009-10-19 Janus Weil
PR fortran/41586
* pars
--- Comment #4 from janus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-10-19 18:46 ---
Mine. Have a patch:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2009-10/msg00171.html
--
janus at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #3 from janus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-10-16 21:04 ---
> AND ALSO FOR:
>
> type t0
> end type t0
> type(t0), allocatable :: m(:)
> allocate(t0 :: m(3))
> end
No, this one actually works (since 'm' is not a scalar):
if (m.data != 0B)
{
__builtin_free ((void
--- Comment #2 from tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-10-11 16:44 ---
Confirmed.
--
tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unass
--- Comment #1 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-10-05 15:17 ---
Does not need to be a component or derived type, any scalar leaks:
integer , allocatable :: a
allocate(a)
a = 42
end
MAIN__ ()
{
integer(kind=4) * a;
{
void * restrict D.1366;
D.1366 = (void * restrict)
