https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40958
Francois-Xavier Coudert changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40958
--- Comment #20 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: kargl
Date: Fri Jun 5 20:40:35 2015
New Revision: 224171
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=224171&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2015-06-03 Russell Whitesides
Steven G. Kargl
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40958
--- Comment #19 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: kargl
Date: Fri Jun 5 16:54:53 2015
New Revision: 224159
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=224159&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2015-06-03 Russell Whitesides
Steven G. Kargl
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40958
--- Comment #18 from russelldub at gmail dot com ---
Created attachment 33703
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=33703&action=edit
Proposed patch to fix module equivalence duplicates
Here is a proposed fix for the problem relate
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40958
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |NEW
--- Comment #17 from Dominique
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40958
Harald Anlauf changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||anlauf at gmx dot de
--- Comment #16 from
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40958
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|WAITING
--- Comment #15 from Domin
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40958
--- Comment #14 from Joost VandeVondele
---
(In reply to Janne Blomqvist from comment #13)
I believe a lot of progress has been made indeed.
> However, the fundamental(?) issue of module sizes growing exponentially with
> deep module hierarchie
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40958
Janne Blomqvist changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |REOPENED
--- Comment #13 from Janne Blo
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40958
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |WAITING
--- Comment #12 from Domin
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40958
--- Comment #11 from Joost VandeVondele
2013-04-17 19:36:45 UTC ---
With these patches in, parallel compilation of multi-file cp2k becomes
significantly faster. Time for a full build goes from 70s to 50s. I think that
in a parallel build t
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40958
--- Comment #10 from Tobias Burnus 2013-04-17
13:50:58 UTC ---
Author: jb
Date: Wed Apr 17 10:19:40 2013
New Revision: 198023
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=198023&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR 40958 Compress module files with zlib.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40958
Tobias Burnus changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
--- C
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40958
Janne Blomqvist changed:
What|Removed |Added
URL||http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-p
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40958
Joost VandeVondele changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||Joost.VandeVondele at mat
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40958
--- Comment #6 from Thomas Koenig 2011-11-29
17:49:31 UTC ---
Author: tkoenig
Date: Tue Nov 29 17:49:24 2011
New Revision: 181810
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=181810
Log:
2011-11-29 Thomas Koenig
PR fortran/40958
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40958
Joost VandeVondele changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comme
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40958
--- Comment #4 from Joost VandeVondele
2011-11-28 14:24:02 UTC ---
Just for reference, compiling CP2K_2009-05-01.f90 results in 684 modules,
stracing yields something like 12000 calls to open, and 148'847'399 calls to
lseek.
Clearly anything red
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40958
Joost VandeVondele changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||blomqvist.janne at gmail
--- Comment #2 from jv244 at cam dot ac dot uk 2009-08-04 10:13 ---
It looks like also module.c contains minit calls that need to be modified. But
for a 50% savings in module size, that seems still a localized effort
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40958
--- Comment #1 from steven at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-08-04 09:10 ---
Yup
--
steven at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED
21 matches
Mail list logo