--- Comment #7 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-05-08 14:02 ---
(In reply to comment #6)
> Paul, this PR seems to be fixed. Can it be closed?
>
Yes. I said on the list that I would not backport, unless asked, and then
waited :-)
Thanks for jogging my memory.
Pau;
--
pau
--- Comment #6 from dfranke at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-05-07 19:53 ---
Paul, this PR seems to be fixed. Can it be closed?
--
dfranke at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
--- Comment #5 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-08-04 12:53 ---
Subject: Bug 40875
Author: pault
Date: Tue Aug 4 12:41:08 2009
New Revision: 150454
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=150454
Log:
2009-08-04 Paul Thomas
PR fortran/40875
* dec
--- Comment #4 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-08-04 11:14 ---
I am going to apply this, together with testcase, as obvious:
Index: gcc/fortran/decl.c
===
--- gcc/fortran/decl.c (revision 150404)
+++ gcc/fortran/dec
--- Comment #3 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-08-03 21:16 ---
(In reply to comment #2)
> See also: [...]
Mis-pasted. That should go to PR 40955 - sorry for the spam.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40875
--- Comment #2 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-08-03 21:14 ---
See also:
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.lang.fortran/browse_thread/thread/eb7ca487876d9420
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40875
--- Comment #1 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-08-03 17:01 ---
Michael,
Thanks for the catch - it's confirmed.
Paul
--
pault at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
