--- Comment #15 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-12-01 17:08 ---
Regarding the ftruncate(64) fall back: one should check that it doesn't operate
on none character devices (isatty) and set errno to something like EBADF.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40812
--- Comment #14 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-12-01 16:21 ---
Some further notes based on the discussion with Kai:
ftruncate: Replace by a configure check for "ftruncate64" and a fallback using
first "SetFilePointer" and then "SetEndOfFile(_get_osfhandle(fd))". Note: The
funct
--- Comment #13 from ktietz at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-09-13 08:19 ---
(In reply to comment #12)
> > > Well, in fact it is MS here. But we on mingw-w64 think at the moment
> > > about
> > > to add an override option for this by defining _LARGE_FILES
>
> (In reply to comment #11)
> >
--- Comment #12 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-09-08 07:21 ---
> > Well, in fact it is MS here. But we on mingw-w64 think at the moment about
> > to add an override option for this by defining _LARGE_FILES
(In reply to comment #11)
> I worked on some of the current large file
--- Comment #11 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-09-07 23:58
---
I worked on some of the current large file defines in libgfortran. Show me a
patch of what you want to do. It should be OK. A patch is worth a thousand
words.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?i
--- Comment #10 from ktietz at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-09-06 20:05 ---
(In reply to comment #9)
> (In reply to comment #8)
> > (In reply to comment #7)
> > > (In reply to comment #6)
> > > > I think I found the issue within gfortran for mingw.
> > >
> > > I think you have this backward
--- Comment #9 from kargl at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-09-06 19:09 ---
(In reply to comment #8)
> (In reply to comment #7)
> > (In reply to comment #6)
> > > I think I found the issue within gfortran for mingw.
> >
> > I think you have this backwards. "the issue within mingw
> > for gfo
--- Comment #8 from ktietz at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-09-06 18:52 ---
(In reply to comment #7)
> (In reply to comment #6)
> > I think I found the issue within gfortran for mingw.
>
> I think you have this backwards. "the issue within mingw
> for gfortran" would be a better description
--- Comment #7 from kargl at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-09-06 18:45 ---
(In reply to comment #6)
> I think I found the issue within gfortran for mingw.
I think you have this backwards. "the issue within mingw
for gfortran" would be a better description of the issue.
It is afterall mingw
--- Comment #6 from ktietz at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-09-06 18:07 ---
I think I found the issue within gfortran for mingw. The issue is that off_t is
for mingw defined as 'long' (like _off_t). There is a 64-bit off64_t, which
holds in fact 64-bits and can be used with the ftello64, and
--- Comment #5 from fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-09-05 10:10
---
I can confirm the issue with Steve's testcase on a (i686-darwin) to
(i586-pc-mingw32) cross-compiler, at trunk revision 151373. The issue can even
be seen while running the compiled program under wine, which shoul
11 matches
Mail list logo
