[Bug fortran/40041] spurious warning with INTRINSIC statement

2009-05-06 Thread burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #5 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-05-06 15:46 --- FIXED on the trunk (4.5). Thanks for reporting it. Crossref: The warning was added by Daniel Franke with Rev. 126153 for PR 20373. -- burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed

[Bug fortran/40041] spurious warning with INTRINSIC statement

2009-05-06 Thread burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #4 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-05-06 15:45 --- Subject: Bug 40041 Author: burnus Date: Wed May 6 15:44:18 2009 New Revision: 147183 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=147183 Log: 2009-05-06 Tobias Burnus PR fortran/40041 *

[Bug fortran/40041] spurious warning with INTRINSIC statement

2009-05-06 Thread burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #3 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-05-06 14:28 --- > Btw, adding "REAL ABS,MAX" doesn't help either, so it's not related to the > function's types. Well, exactly that should trigger the warning! Thus it shall not help silencing the warning! Some light testing - now

[Bug fortran/40041] spurious warning with INTRINSIC statement

2009-05-06 Thread dfranke at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #2 from dfranke at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-05-06 11:57 --- (In reply to comment #1) > > The same warnings are given if the arguments of ABS/MAX are of default-real > > kind, so this not related to implicit typing. > > I have to admit that I don't fully understand that sente

[Bug fortran/40041] spurious warning with INTRINSIC statement

2009-05-06 Thread burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #1 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-05-06 10:26 --- (In reply to comment #0) > The same warnings are given if the arguments of ABS/MAX are of default-real > kind, so this not related to implicit typing. I have to admit that I don't fully understand that sentence, but