--
kargl at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever Confirmed|0 |1
Last reconfirm
--- Comment #6 from kargl at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-04-24 17:59 ---
The problem is due to the null() in
character(200), pointer :: descrip => null()
If you comment out this statement or remove '=> null()',
then the code compiles and runs. A slighly reduced testcase
is
module
--- Comment #5 from david dot sagan at gmail dot com 2009-04-24 14:27
---
Sorry. I was going by the documentation on the link ("crashes, loss of data,
severe memory leak"). Thanks for the information.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39879
--- Comment #4 from kargl at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-04-24 14:17 ---
This is a fortran problem. It will never be given
a Severity of Critical or Major, which are typically
used by the GCC developers to denote bootstrap problems
or a problems with the C compiler.
--
kargl at gcc dot
--- Comment #3 from david dot sagan at gmail dot com 2009-04-24 13:06
---
Corrected severity.
--
david dot sagan at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #2 from dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr 2009-04-24 08:54 ---
Confirmed for gfortran 4.3.3, 4.4.0, and trunk; no error with 4.2.3.
g95 0.91 gives:
Setting bunch_params 113 113
Have set
After 1st set
Setting bunch_params 113 113
Have set
End
Remaining memory: 10848 bytes
--- Comment #1 from david dot sagan at gmail dot com 2009-04-24 06:36
---
Created an attachment (id=17686)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=17686&action=view)
Example program which shows the bug
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39879
