--- Comment #10 from janus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-06-22 21:02 ---
Subject: Bug 39850
Author: janus
Date: Mon Jun 22 21:02:19 2009
New Revision: 148816
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=148816
Log:
2009-06-22 Janus Weil
PR fortran/37254
PR fo
--- Comment #9 from dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr 2009-06-22 14:17 ---
The patch in comment #8 fixes the ICEs reported in comment #7 and #8.
> Yeah, the same happens for the examples in PR37254.
I also so it, but I preferred to report against this pr.
Thanks for the quick patch.
--
--- Comment #8 from janus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-06-22 09:04 ---
> pr39850.f90:12:0: internal compiler error: in gfc_typenode_for_spec, at
> fortran/trans-types.c:995
Yeah, the same happens for the examples in PR37254. I didn't notice it before,
since I changed the test case sligh
--- Comment #7 from dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr 2009-06-22 08:28 ---
At revision 148777, compiling the code in comment #0 gives:
[ibook-dhum] f90/bug% gfc pr39850.f90
pr39850.f90: In function 'test':
pr39850.f90:12:0: internal compiler error: in gfc_typenode_for_spec, at
fortran/trans
--- Comment #6 from janus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-06-21 19:16 ---
Fixed with r148767. Closing.
--
janus at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #5 from janus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-06-21 19:05 ---
Subject: Bug 39850
Author: janus
Date: Sun Jun 21 19:05:35 2009
New Revision: 148767
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=148767
Log:
2009-06-21 Janus Weil
PR fortran/39850
* inte
--- Comment #4 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-06-20 17:44 ---
Regarding comment 0: I believe the program is valid
Regarding proc_decl_8.f90 and interface_21.f90: The programs are obviously
invalid - and the error message is OK.
* * *
In case of proc_decl_8.f90/interface_21.f
--- Comment #3 from janus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-06-20 15:17 ---
(In reply to comment #2)
> Btw, if comment #0 is correct, then the test case 'interface_21.f90' is wrong
Same goes for proc_decl_8.f90.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39850
--- Comment #2 from janus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-06-20 14:41 ---
Btw, if comment #0 is correct, then the test case 'interface_21.f90' is wrong
(that is: the test case itself is legal, but the dg-error is wrong). It was
added by Jerry DeLisle in r129799, in connection with PR33162.
--- Comment #1 from janus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-06-20 14:11 ---
After the improvement of error messages, the test case gives:
Error: Interface mismatch in dummy procedure 'a' at (1): 'func' is not a
function
Mine.
--
janus at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|
--
janus at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||janus at gcc dot gnu dot org
Status|UNCONFIRMED
11 matches
Mail list logo
