https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39695
markeggleston at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Stat
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39695
--- Comment #10 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-8 branch has been updated by Mark Eggleston
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:15e518600a9ef82b55d2ec75d8d41d767132f475
commit r8-10261-g15e518600a9ef82b55d2ec75d8d41d767132f475
Author: Mark Eggleston
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39695
--- Comment #9 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-9 branch has been updated by Mark Eggleston
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:7c9bfd404691e5dac7e32830ae6d9726ccf59683
commit r9-8608-g7c9bfd404691e5dac7e32830ae6d9726ccf59683
Author: Mark Eggleston
D
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39695
--- Comment #8 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Mark Eggleston
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:8358ac9bbc57d6986c9bd5dd17c0331a60114f45
commit r10-8160-g8358ac9bbc57d6986c9bd5dd17c0331a60114f45
Author: Mark Eggleston
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39695
--- Comment #7 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Mark Eggleston
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:eb069ae8819c3a84d7f78becc5501e21ee3a9554
commit r11-524-geb069ae8819c3a84d7f78becc5501e21ee3a9554
Author: Mark Eggleston
Date: T
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39695
--- Comment #6 from markeggleston at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Created attachment 47688
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=47688&action=edit
attempt to fix remaining issues
Initial attempt at fixing the remaining issues. See attached
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39695
markeggleston at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed|2009-12-17 21:05:39 |2020-1-10
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39695
--- Comment #4 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org ---
As noted by Dominique in comment 2:
Comment 1 is fixed since 4.8, and out of the three cases in comment 0 only the
second one persists (together with comment 3).
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39695
--- Comment #3 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Another example: proc_ptr_result_4.f90 in the testsuite yields the following
error since 4.9 (see also PR59428):
procedure(sin), pointer :: f
1
Error: Procedure p
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39695
--- Comment #2 from Dominique d'Humieres ---
As for 4.8.1 and trunk (r200371), only the second test in comment #0 gives the
'ppr@' name:
real g ! "cannot have a type"
1
Error: Symbol 'ppr@' at (1) cannot have a type
The first test do
--
pault at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever Confirmed|0 |1
Last reconfirm
--- Comment #1 from janus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-06-26 12:18 ---
Another test case for this can be found in PR40541:
program test
procedure(real), pointer :: p
p => f() ! << Invalid f() returns a LOGICAL(1) function, but p is a REAL one
contains
function f()
pointer :: f
12 matches
Mail list logo
