--- Comment #7 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-01-25 21:08 ---
Created an attachment (id=17182)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=17182&action=view)
A provisional patch for the PR
It take back what I said previously:-)
The attached bootstraps and regtests OK.
--- Comment #6 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-01-25 18:21 ---
(In reply to comment #5)
> (In reply to comment #4)
> > (In reply to comment #3)
>
> >In the latter case, it is non-empty if ubound > lbound only. Comparing
> > ubound and lbound according to the stride to check f
--- Comment #5 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-01-22 12:39 ---
(In reply to comment #4)
> (In reply to comment #3)
>In the latter case, it is non-empty if ubound > lbound only. Comparing
> ubound and lbound according to the stride to check for zero-sized arrays
> doesn't make
--- Comment #4 from mikael at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-01-20 22:29 ---
(In reply to comment #3)
> DLA => DDA(2:3, 1:3:2, 5:4:-1, NF2, NF5:NF2:MF2)
>
> The descriptor built for DLA has negative strides for dimension >= 3.
> This makes ubound fail.
>
Forget this
DLA => DDA(2:3, 1:3:2,
--- Comment #3 from mikael at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-01-19 18:48 ---
DLA => DDA(2:3, 1:3:2, 5:4:-1, NF2, NF5:NF2:MF2)
The descriptor built for DLA has negative strides for dimension >= 3.
This makes ubound fail.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38852
--
jv244 at cam dot ac dot uk changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever Confirmed|0 |1
Last reconfirmed
--- Comment #2 from jv244 at cam dot ac dot uk 2009-01-15 05:56 ---
looks like this always failed ?
--
jv244 at cam dot ac dot uk changed:
What|Removed |Added
OtherBugsDep
--- Comment #1 from dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr 2009-01-14 22:08 ---
Confirmed on i686-apple-darwin9/trunk, it also fails with gfortran 4.2.3 and
4.3.3.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38852
