--- Comment #7 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-01-31 15:00 ---
Fixed on trunk and 4.4
Paul
--
pault at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #6 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-01-31 14:57 ---
Subject: Bug 38324
Author: pault
Date: Sun Jan 31 14:57:13 2010
New Revision: 156401
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=156401
Log:
2010-01-31 Paul Thomas
PR fortran/38324
* exp
--- Comment #5 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-01-31 12:05 ---
Subject: Bug 38324
Author: pault
Date: Sun Jan 31 12:05:22 2010
New Revision: 156399
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=156399
Log:
2010-01-31 Paul Thomas
PR fortran/38324
* exp
--- Comment #4 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-01-30 18:22 ---
I just, at last, posted a fix on the list.
Paul
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38324
--- Comment #3 from mikael at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-01-29 22:03 ---
patch http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2009-01/msg00348.html
The failure for ik=8 is not fixed by this patch.
I thought it was ok because of the kind conversion function call.
But it seems it's not.
It is impacting f
--- Comment #2 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-12-17 12:20 ---
This is, of course, confirmed!
Paul
--
pault at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #1 from dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr 2008-12-01 13:54 ---
AFAICT this pr is the cause of half of the failures of
gfortran.dg/alloc_comp_constructor_1.f90 on i686-apple-darwin9 with
-fdefault-integer-8:
FAIL: gfortran.dg/alloc_comp_constructor_1.f90 -O0 execution test
FAIL
