--- Comment #10 from ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-12-05 07:40
---
> I built gmp and mpfr with defaults.
http://gcc.gnu.org/install/specific.html#sparc-sun-solaris2
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38268
--- Comment #9 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-12-05 05:46
---
That got me farther. Now this:
gnu-make[3]: Entering directory `/home/delisle/gcc/obj44/gcc'
/home/delisle/gcc/obj44/./prev-gcc/xgcc -B/home/delisle/gcc/obj44/./prev-gcc/
-B/home/delisle/gcc/usr/i386-pc-solaris2
--- Comment #8 from ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-12-03 09:12
---
> gcc -g -fkeep-inline-functions -DIN_GCC -W -Wall -Wwrite-strings
> -Wstrict-prototypes -Wmissing-prototypes -Wcast-qual -Wold-style-definition
> -Wc++-compat -Wmissing-format-attribute -pedantic -Wno-long-lon
--- Comment #7 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-12-03 04:06
---
Eric,
Here is the problem I am seeing:
gcc -g -fkeep-inline-functions -DIN_GCC -W -Wall -Wwrite-strings
-Wstrict-prototypes -Wmissing-prototypes -Wcast-qual -Wold-style-definition
-Wc++-compat -Wmissing-forma
--- Comment #6 from ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-11-26 11:40
---
> Is there any issue to direclty fix this mistake in gfortran sources ?
This is not a mistake and this is not specific to fortran:
([EMAIL PROTECTED]) ~ $ gcc -o t t.c -m64 -shared-libgcc
([EMAIL PROTECTED]) ~ $
--- Comment #5 from mt1 at systella dot fr 2008-11-26 08:27 ---
(In reply to comment #4)
> > There is no error on link stage, but gfortran tries to link program with 32
> > bits libraries, not with 64 bits one even I force -m64.
>
> Not quite. The binary is correctly linked against 64-
--- Comment #4 from ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-11-26 08:05
---
> There is no error on link stage, but gfortran tries to link program with 32
> bits libraries, not with 64 bits one even I force -m64.
Not quite. The binary is correctly linked against 64-bit libraries, but the
--- Comment #3 from ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-11-26 07:48
---
> I have been given access to a mchine with this architecture and have not,
> after several evenings at it, been able to complete a single build of
> gfortran.
Weird, folks generally can build it flawlessly, see
--- Comment #2 from mt1 at systella dot fr 2008-11-26 07:17 ---
(In reply to comment #1)
> I have been given access to a mchine with this architecture and have not,
> after
> several evenings at it, been able to complete a single build of gfortran. I
> notice some instructions on the g
--- Comment #1 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-11-26 03:53
---
I have been given access to a mchine with this architecture and have not, after
several evenings at it, been able to complete a single build of gfortran. I
notice some instructions on the gcc web page about some
10 matches
Mail list logo
