[Bug fortran/38247] problem with contained subprocedure.

2009-03-29 Thread fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #10 from fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-03-29 09:03 --- Closing for now, as it's been three months without news from the bug reporter. Please reopen the report and attached a testcase if it's still not fixed. -- fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

[Bug fortran/38247] problem with contained subprocedure.

2009-01-03 Thread dfranke at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #9 from dfranke at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-01-04 00:43 --- (In reply to comment #8) > Try to make sure that the testcases you attach reproduce the > problem, by testing your testcase ;-) Marked as waiting for a testcase. -- dfranke at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

[Bug fortran/38247] problem with contained subprocedure.

2009-01-02 Thread jv244 at cam dot ac dot uk
--- Comment #8 from jv244 at cam dot ac dot uk 2009-01-02 18:57 --- (In reply to comment #7) > Subject: Re: problem with contained subprocedure. > > Hello, > > This appears to be the problem. In any case, I just submitted a new archive > file. I hope this one's correct. No... it is n

[Bug fortran/38247] problem with contained subprocedure.

2008-11-24 Thread clerman at fuse dot net
--- Comment #7 from clerman at fuse dot net 2008-11-24 18:54 --- Subject: Re: problem with contained subprocedure. Hello, This appears to be the problem. In any case, I just submitted a new archive file. I hope this one's correct. Thanks for your help. Let me know when the fix has be

[Bug fortran/38247] problem with contained subprocedure.

2008-11-24 Thread clerman at fuse dot net
--- Comment #6 from clerman at fuse dot net 2008-11-24 18:50 --- Created an attachment (id=16762) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=16762&action=view) updated, and corrected (I hope) archive hello, Sorry for the mixup on the archive. I've attached a new one, bug32_1a.

[Bug fortran/38247] problem with contained subprocedure.

2008-11-24 Thread kargl at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #4 from kargl at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-11-24 15:32 --- After removing all of your full path names, I get REMOVE:kargl[215] gfc4x WinModI.f90 -c -Wall -O3 -ffast-math -funroll-loops -std=f2003 -fno-backslash -owinmod.o >winmod.xyz WinModI.f90:68: Error: Can't open include

[Bug fortran/38247] problem with contained subprocedure.

2008-11-24 Thread burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #5 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-11-24 16:22 --- To add: There is currently a build problem for the linux 32bit version of the gfortran nightlies; thus there has been no newer build since about one month. -- burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: Wha

[Bug fortran/38247] problem with contained subprocedure.

2008-11-24 Thread mikael at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #3 from mikael at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-11-24 15:29 --- (In reply to comment #2) > This is probably too old: > GNU Fortran (GCC) 4.4.0 20081021 (experimental) [trunk revision 141258] > Definitely, the bug is PR37445, which was fixed on 3rd November. -- http://gcc.gnu

[Bug fortran/38247] problem with contained subprocedure.

2008-11-24 Thread kargl at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #2 from kargl at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-11-24 15:19 --- Your shell script contains items of the form /home/norm/design/numrec/nrTypeM.f90 which of course doesn't exist so the shell script aborts when executed. BTW, if it is fixed on amd64, then it is mostlikely fixed on

[Bug fortran/38247] problem with contained subprocedure.

2008-11-24 Thread clerman at fuse dot net
--- Comment #1 from clerman at fuse dot net 2008-11-24 14:37 --- Created an attachment (id=16757) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=16757&action=view) archive described in the initial bug report Pleas see initial bug report. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug