https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38220
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED
Resolution|-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38220
--- Comment #10 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Jeff Hammond from comment #8)
> For what it's worth, ISO/IEC DIS 1539-1:2022 (E) now contains the following:
>
> All standard procedures in the intrinsic module ISO_C_BINDING, other
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38220
--- Comment #9 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Joost VandeVondele from comment #6)
> ifort rejects this code, gfortran and cft compile but trigger the runtime
> abort, pgf90 compiles and runs without abort.
Actually that code has
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38220
Jeff Hammond changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jeff.science at gmail dot com
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38220
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org |unassigned at gcc dot
gnu.org
--
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38220
Joost VandeVondele changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
CC|
--- Comment #5 from tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-01-06 23:05 ---
Fixed on trunk, closing.
--
tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #4 from tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-01-06 23:03 ---
Subject: Bug 38220
Author: tkoenig
Date: Tue Jan 6 23:03:18 2009
New Revision: 143140
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=143140
Log:
2009-01-06 Thomas Koenig
PR fortran/38220
--- Comment #3 from tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-01-06 13:05 ---
This appears to resolve the issue(s):
Index: interface.c
===
--- interface.c (revision 143076)
+++ interface.c (working copy)
@@ -2411,9 +2411,12 @@ vo
--- Comment #2 from dfranke at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-12-09 20:49 ---
symbol.c (generate_isocbinding_symbol):
4139 /* Here, we're taking the simple approach. We're defining
4140 c_loc as an external identifier so the compiler will put
4141 what we expect on the stack for
--- Comment #1 from dfranke at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-12-09 20:30 ---
The same seems to hold for C_FUNLOC, but not C_F_POINTER?!
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38220
11 matches
Mail list logo
