--- Comment #18 from tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-11-23 15:17
---
... and now really closing.
--
tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #17 from tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-11-23 15:10
---
Fixed on 4.3.
Closing.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38135
--- Comment #16 from tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-11-23 15:10
---
Subject: Bug 38135
Author: tkoenig
Date: Sun Nov 23 15:08:32 2008
New Revision: 142134
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=142134
Log:
2008-11-23 Thomas Koenig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
PR
--- Comment #15 from mikael at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-11-19 20:56 ---
(In reply to comment #14)
> Mikael, if you think the problem you mentioned in comment #4 warrants
> its own PR, maybe you could open it.
>
PR 38184 opened for that.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?i
--- Comment #14 from tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-11-19 19:33
---
The problem is fixed on trunk, I think we can close this
after backporting.
Mikael, if you think the problem you mentioned in comment #4 warrants
its own PR, maybe you could open it.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bu
--- Comment #13 from tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-11-18 22:44
---
Subject: Bug 38135
Author: tkoenig
Date: Tue Nov 18 22:43:05 2008
New Revision: 141982
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=141982
Log:
2008-11-18 Thomas Koenig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
PR
--- Comment #12 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-11-16 22:25 ---
Thomas,
Since you are there, bar the shouting, I thought that I would assign you:-)
Cheers and thanks
Paul
--
pault at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
--- Comment #11 from tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-11-16 20:38
---
Regression-test and full patch, including test cases, tomorrow.
RL keeps interfering :-)
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38135
--- Comment #10 from mikael at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-11-16 19:44 ---
(In reply to comment #9)
Those are only details, it works nicely :-).
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38135
--- Comment #9 from mikael at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-11-16 18:46 ---
(In reply to comment #8)
Are you sure this is needed ?
if (sempty)
{
- /* Switch immediately to the pad array. */
+ /* Pretend we are using the pad array the first time around, too. */
src
--- Comment #8 from tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-11-16 16:03 ---
Created an attachment (id=16700)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=16700&action=view)
Patch for the library part
Well, here's a patch for the library part. Apparently, nobody ever paid much
attent
--- Comment #7 from mikael at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-11-16 15:22 ---
(In reply to comment #6)
> I'm onto it; the problems are in reshape.m4 / reshape_generic.c .
>
Ok, leaving it to you.
According to my tests, sstride0 has suspicious values.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show
--- Comment #6 from tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-11-16 13:58 ---
(In reply to comment #5)
>
> for (2), I'm puzzled. :(
I'm onto it; the problems are in reshape.m4 / reshape_generic.c .
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38135
--- Comment #5 from mikael at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-11-16 13:45 ---
Index: simplify.c
===
--- simplify.c (révision 141833)
+++ simplify.c (copie de travail)
@@ -3410,9 +3410,6 @@ is_constant_array_expr (gfc_expr *e)
--- Comment #4 from mikael at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-11-16 11:38 ---
(In reply to comment #3)
> The problem appears to be the empty SOURCE with the presence of PAD.
I agree.
There are two bugs actually:
(1) the front-end doesn't expand the reshape.
(at least in this case: reshape
--- Comment #3 from tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-11-16 09:04 ---
Simplified test case (without the second reshape):
The problem appears to be the empty SOURCE with the presence of PAD.
$ cat bar.f90
program main
integer, parameter :: N = 3
integer :: A(N,N)
integer :: b(n+
16 matches
Mail list logo
