--- Comment #11 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-06-06 21:10 ---
Subject: Bug 37203
Author: burnus
Date: Sat Jun 6 21:09:57 2009
New Revision: 148238
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=148238
Log:
2009-06-06 Daniel Franke
PR fortran/37203
--- Comment #10 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-06-04 21:59 ---
Merged patch from the fortran-dev branch to the trunk (4.5).
Close bug as FIXED. Thanks for the patches, Thomas and Daniel!
--
burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed
--- Comment #9 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-06-04 21:52 ---
Subject: Bug 37203
Author: burnus
Date: Thu Jun 4 21:52:32 2009
New Revision: 148190
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=148190
Log:
gcc/fortran/
2009-06-04 Daniel Franke
PR fortran/37
--- Comment #8 from dfranke at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-03-22 12:12 ---
Subject: Bug 37203
Author: dfranke
Date: Sun Mar 22 12:12:10 2009
New Revision: 144996
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=144996
Log:
gcc/fortran/:
2009-03-22 Daniel Franke
PR fortran
--- Comment #7 from dfranke at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-01-04 21:25 ---
(In reply to comment #6)
> Stupidity needs to be punished. Assigning myself to fix it.
Patch: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2009-01/msg00049.html
--
dfranke at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|R
--- Comment #6 from dfranke at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-01-04 19:10 ---
(In reply to comment #5)
> (In reply to comment #4)
> > which detects invalid permutations in the case of constant(!) arguments.
> > Closing as fixed.
> >
> No, it's not. Reopening.
> The initial testcase is still
--- Comment #5 from mikael at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-01-04 19:00 ---
(In reply to comment #4)
> which detects invalid permutations in the case of constant(!) arguments.
> Closing as fixed.
>
No, it's not. Reopening.
The initial testcase is still not catch.
--
mikael at gcc dot g
--- Comment #4 from dfranke at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-01-04 14:56 ---
simplify.c (gfc_simplify_reshape) has:
3547 if (x[order[i]])
3548{
3549 gfc_error ("Invalid permutation in ORDER parameter at %L",
3550 &e->where);
3551 gfc_free_ex
--- Comment #3 from tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-09-07 13:34 ---
Subject: Bug 37203
Author: tkoenig
Date: Sun Sep 7 13:33:18 2008
New Revision: 140086
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=140086
Log:
2008-09-07 Thomas Koenig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
PR fo
--- Comment #2 from tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-09-07 09:12 ---
I'm working on the run-time test.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37203
--- Comment #1 from tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-08-23 14:11 ---
Confirmed.
We should also have a run-time check for this:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/tmp$ gfortran -fbounds-check foo.f90
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/tmp$ ./a.out
1 6 2 0 3
11 matches
Mail list logo
