--- Comment #11 from tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-07-25 12:27
---
Fixed on trunk, backporting to 4.5 would be non-trivial
because trunk uses the array access macros, and 4.4 doesn't.
Closing.
--
tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed
--- Comment #10 from tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-07-19 15:07
---
Subject: Bug 36874
Author: tkoenig
Date: Sun Jul 19 15:07:21 2009
New Revision: 149792
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=149792
Log:
2009-07-19 Thomas Koenig
PR libfortran/34670
--- Comment #9 from tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-06-07 14:41 ---
If nobody minds, I'll do this (it's part of PR 34670
anyway).
--
tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
---
--- Comment #8 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-06-07 13:59 ---
Compile time check is now there (4.5 trunk). Missing is a run-time check.
Example:
real, dimension(1,0) :: a, b, c
integer :: sp(3), i
a = 4.0
sp = 1
i = 1
b = eoshift (a,sp(1:i)) ! Invalid
end
NAG f95
--- Comment #7 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-06-07 13:46 ---
Subject: Bug 36874
Author: burnus
Date: Sun Jun 7 13:45:47 2009
New Revision: 148247
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=148247
Log:
2009-06-07 Daniel Franke
* check.c (dim_rank_check)
--- Comment #6 from dfranke at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-04-05 20:10 ---
Subject: Bug 36874
Author: dfranke
Date: Sun Apr 5 20:09:58 2009
New Revision: 145570
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=145570
Log:
gcc/fortran/:
2009-04-05 Daniel Franke
PR fortran
--- Comment #5 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-01-24 19:41 ---
(In reply to comment #4)
> After adding the the missing checks to gfc_check_cshift() and
> gfc_check_eoshift() respectively, I get a couple of errors for
> gfortran.dg/zero_sized_1.f90 [...]
Thanks! The errors look O
--- Comment #4 from dfranke at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-01-24 18:39 ---
After adding the the missing checks to gfc_check_cshift() and
gfc_check_eoshift() respectively, I get a couple of errors for
gfortran.dg/zero_sized_1.f90:
$> gfortran-svn -g -Wall -W zero_sized_1.f90
zero_sized_1.f9
--
dfranke at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |dfranke at gcc dot gnu dot
|dot org
--- Comment #3 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-07-28 11:21 ---
> Why a run-time check?
Because the shape might not be known at compile time? And a compile-time check
because compile-time checks are nicer ;-)
> AFAIK, we can always determine the rank at runtime
Yes, the RANK shou
--- Comment #2 from tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-07-28 10:48 ---
Why a run-time check?
AFAIK, we can always determine the rank at runtime, so unless somebody messes
with our array descriptors big time, we should be safe.
--
tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
--- Comment #1 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-07-19 13:48 ---
Note: One should have a run-time and a compile-time check.
Example:
real, dimension(1,0) :: a, b, c
b = eoshift (a,(/1/))
Since dim=1, the shape of the 2nd dimension of A needs to be the same as the
first dimens
12 matches
Mail list logo
