--- Comment #8 from janus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-04-09 09:41 ---
Fixed by r145815. Closing.
--
janus at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #7 from janus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-04-09 09:39 ---
Subject: Bug 36704
Author: janus
Date: Thu Apr 9 09:39:09 2009
New Revision: 145815
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=145815
Log:
2009-04-09 Janus Weil
PR fortran/36704
* decl
--- Comment #6 from janus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-03-11 16:26 ---
Patch: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2009-03/msg00044.html
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36704
--- Comment #5 from janus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-01-16 09:42 ---
Further test cases:
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.lang.fortran/browse_thread/thread/e0d04d755453a2a5
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36704
--- Comment #4 from janus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-12-02 11:59 ---
Subject: Bug 36704
Author: janus
Date: Tue Dec 2 11:58:16 2008
New Revision: 142351
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=142351
Log:
2008-12-02 Janus Weil <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
PR fortran/3
--- Comment #3 from janus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-11-30 22:00 ---
Created an attachment (id=16795)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=16795&action=view)
patch v2
This updated patch passes the testsuite without regressions and adds some
additional checks.
--
htt
--- Comment #2 from janus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-11-30 17:50 ---
Created an attachment (id=16793)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=16793&action=view)
patch v1
Attached is a minimal patch, which makes the simple case work where a separate
result variable is used,
--- Comment #1 from janus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-11-28 21:26 ---
Btw the examples in comment #0 slightly miss the point, since they lack the
POINTER attribute. Correct version:
function foo() result(bar)
procedure(),pointer :: bar
and
function foo()
procedure(),pointer :: foo
