[Bug fortran/36553] [4.4 Regression] regression due to revision 136821

2008-06-17 Thread burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #6 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-06-18 05:33 --- I get in valgrind (trunk revision 136838) with -m32 and -m64 on x86-64-linux: ==3145== Invalid read of size 4 ==3145==at 0x804876D: check_integer4_rank1_ (test.f90:14) ==3145==by 0x80489E1: MAIN__ (test.f90:2

[Bug fortran/36553] [4.4 Regression] regression due to revision 136821

2008-06-17 Thread jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #5 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-06-18 04:57 --- OK, with r136820 $ gfc -m64 -fbounds-check pr36553.f90 $ ./a.out At line 17 of file pr36553.f90 Fortran runtime error: Array bound mismatch, size mismatch for dimension 1 of array 'expected' (0/33290630479208413

[Bug fortran/36553] [4.4 Regression] regression due to revision 136821

2008-06-17 Thread jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #4 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-06-18 04:27 --- When I revert just the files in my patch, the test case passes with -m32 and segfaults on -m64 at run time. I don't think this is related to 136821 directly. Looking at the -fdump-tree-original between -m32 and -

[Bug fortran/36553] [4.4 Regression] regression due to revision 136821

2008-06-17 Thread jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #3 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-06-18 00:18 --- I can reproduce this on x86-64-linux by using the -m32 option. -- jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added -

[Bug fortran/36553] [4.4 Regression] regression due to revision 136821

2008-06-17 Thread dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr
--- Comment #2 from dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr 2008-06-17 22:04 --- (In reply to comment #1) > It runs fine for me on x86_ia64 - did you use any options? I have set the build to i686-apple-darwin9. The bus error comes with default (-m32 and no options), the test passes with -m64. -

[Bug fortran/36553] [4.4 Regression] regression due to revision 136821

2008-06-17 Thread pault at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #1 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-06-17 19:33 --- (In reply to comment #0) > At revision 136821 the following code: Dominique, It runs fine for me on x86_ia64 - did you use any options? I've CC'd Jerry, since 136821 was his. Paul -- pault at gcc dot gnu dot or