[Bug fortran/36096] F2008 Bessel: Documentation/diagnostic errors

2014-06-09 Thread fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36096 Francois-Xavier Coudert changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug fortran/36096] F2008 Bessel: Documentation/diagnostic errors

2014-06-09 Thread fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36096 --- Comment #3 from Francois-Xavier Coudert --- Author: fxcoudert Date: Mon Jun 9 09:49:01 2014 New Revision: 211368 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=211368&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR fortran/36096 * intrinsic.texi: Fix documentation

[Bug fortran/36096] F2008 Bessel: Documentation/diagnostic errors

2009-03-28 Thread fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org
-- fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Ever Confirmed|0 |1 Last recon

[Bug fortran/36096] F2008 Bessel: Documentation/diagnostic errors

2008-05-04 Thread kargl at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #2 from kargl at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-05-05 06:06 --- (In reply to comment #1) > > ERF, ERFC, GAMMA, and LOG_GAMMA returned NaN for REAL*10 inputs in > > my test. EXPONENT returned garbage for REAL*10 and FRACTION > > There is another thing which has to be addressed. On

[Bug fortran/36096] F2008 Bessel: Documentation/diagnostic errors

2008-05-04 Thread burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #1 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-05-05 05:28 --- > ERF, ERFC, GAMMA, and LOG_GAMMA returned NaN for REAL*10 inputs in > my test. EXPONENT returned garbage for REAL*10 and FRACTION There is another thing which has to be addressed. On Windows there seems to be no "l