--- Comment #9 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-02-06 08:16 ---
Thanks to one and all for the quick report and the equally quick fix. As I
said in mail to the list, for the umpteenth time, I have been caught by
Cygwin's ability to disappear some segfaults. I do apologise and, as
--- Comment #8 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-02-05 20:42 ---
Fixed on the trunk (4.3.0). Thanks for the bug report.
--
burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #7 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-02-05 20:41 ---
Subject: Bug 35093
Author: burnus
Date: Tue Feb 5 20:40:45 2008
New Revision: 132128
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=132128
Log:
2008-02-05 Tobias Burnus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
PR fort
--- Comment #6 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-02-05 18:37 ---
Patch:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2008-02/msg00037.html
(Cross reference: The regression was caused by the fix for PR 32315.)
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35093
--- Comment #5 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-02-05 17:29 ---
As I have a patch ... (Currently regtesting; valgrind reports no failures with
that patch.)
--
burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
---
--- Comment #4 from hp at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-02-05 17:21 ---
s/ice-on-valid/ice-on-invalid/
--
hp at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keyw
--- Comment #3 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-02-05 17:13 ---
==25387== Invalid free() / delete / delete[]
==25387==at 0x4C2430F: free (in
/usr/lib64/valgrind/amd64-linux/vgpreload_memcheck.so)
==25387==by 0x414BE9: gfc_assign_data_value (data.c:332)
==25387==by 0x46
--- Comment #2 from dnovillo at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-02-05 16:58
---
Why was I CC'd on this PR?
--
dnovillo at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-valid-code
Priority|P3 |P4
--- Comment #1 from hp at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-02-05 16:50 ---
Same for cris-elf, host x86_64 under F 8. Further narrowing of revisions:
r132114 failed and r132112 worked. It can't be the r132114 revision (being i386
only), so it's pretty sure to be pault's commit.
--
hp at gcc
10 matches
Mail list logo
