[Bug fortran/34994] gfortran.dg/missing_optional_dummy_5.f90 doesn't work

2008-01-27 Thread jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #3 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-01-28 02:11 --- Fixed. -- jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCO

[Bug fortran/34994] gfortran.dg/missing_optional_dummy_5.f90 doesn't work

2008-01-27 Thread jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #2 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-01-28 02:09 --- Subject: Bug 34994 Author: jvdelisle Date: Mon Jan 28 02:09:07 2008 New Revision: 131898 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=131898 Log: 2008-01-27 Jerry DeLisle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

[Bug fortran/34994] gfortran.dg/missing_optional_dummy_5.f90 doesn't work

2008-01-27 Thread hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
--- Comment #1 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2008-01-28 00:17 --- With -m32, we got doit () { real(kind=4) doit1[2]; { struct array1_real(kind=4) parm.6; parm.6.dtype = 281; parm.6.dim[0].lbound = 1; parm.6.dim[0].ubound = 2; parm.6.dim[0].stride = 1;