[Bug fortran/34004] Accepts invalid: Ambigiuous interface with subroutine.

2013-12-10 Thread janus at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34004 janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/34004] Accepts invalid: Ambigiuous interface with subroutine.

2013-04-30 Thread tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34004 Thomas Koenig changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|NEW Resolution|FIXED

[Bug fortran/34004] Accepts invalid: Ambigiuous interface with subroutine.

2013-04-30 Thread tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34004 Thomas Koenig changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug fortran/34004] Accepts invalid: Ambigiuous interface with subroutine.

2013-04-28 Thread dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34004 --- Comment #9 from Dominique d'Humieres 2013-04-28 17:14:05 UTC --- > "Two dummy arguments are distinguishable if neither is a subroutine and > neither > is TKR compatible (5.1.1.2) with the other." AFAICT this is not a constraint on t

[Bug fortran/34004] Accepts invalid: Ambigiuous interface with subroutine.

2013-04-28 Thread janus at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34004 janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||janus at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug fortran/34004] Accepts invalid: Ambigiuous interface with subroutine.

2012-08-12 Thread burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34004 Tobias Burnus changed: What|Removed |Added CC||burnus at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #7

[Bug fortran/34004] Accepts invalid: Ambigiuous interface with subroutine.

2012-08-12 Thread mikael at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34004 Mikael Morin changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mikael at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #6 f

[Bug fortran/34004] Accepts invalid: Ambigiuous interface with subroutine.

2008-04-20 Thread burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #5 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-04-20 07:31 --- Note: Fortran 2008 is better in this regard: http://groups.google.com/group/comp.lang.fortran/browse_thread/thread/ff402a68a17d2be9 Here is the relevant text from the current draft, 08-007r2. Reference is sec. 12.4.

[Bug fortran/34004] Accepts invalid: Ambigiuous interface with subroutine.

2008-04-17 Thread fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #4 from fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-04-17 07:30 --- More talk about that recently: http://groups.google.com/group/comp.lang.fortran/browse_thread/thread/ff402a68a17d2be9/543de4c347caa9d0 This is well described in the last example of C.11.2. -- fxcoudert at gcc

[Bug fortran/34004] Accepts invalid: Ambigiuous interface with subroutine.

2007-12-14 Thread burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #3 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-12-14 12:33 --- Related bug: PR 20896 (esp. test case in PR 20896 comment 0). -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34004

[Bug fortran/34004] Accepts invalid: Ambigiuous interface with subroutine.

2007-11-08 Thread burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #2 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-11-08 10:32 --- > "Two dummy arguments are distinguishable if neither is a subroutine and > neither is TKR compatible (5.1.1.2) with the other." > > Does this mean, though, that a subroutine is or is not distinguishable from a > var

[Bug fortran/34004] Accepts invalid: Ambigiuous interface with subroutine.

2007-11-07 Thread pault at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #1 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-11-07 11:02 --- > > "Two dummy arguments are distinguishable if neither is a subroutine and > neither > is TKR compatible (5.1.1.2) with the other." Does this mean, though, that a subroutine is or is not distinguishable from a var