[Bug fortran/33054] RANDOM_SEED is broken with -fdefault-integer-8

2007-08-14 Thread fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org
-- fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |4.3.0 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33054

[Bug fortran/33054] RANDOM_SEED is broken with -fdefault-integer-8

2007-08-12 Thread fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #4 from fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-08-12 20:46 --- Fixed. -- fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSI

[Bug fortran/33054] RANDOM_SEED is broken with -fdefault-integer-8

2007-08-12 Thread fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #3 from fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-08-12 20:45 --- Subject: Bug 33054 Author: fxcoudert Date: Sun Aug 12 20:45:29 2007 New Revision: 127383 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=127383 Log: PR fortran/30964 PR fortran/33054

[Bug fortran/33054] RANDOM_SEED is broken with -fdefault-integer-8

2007-08-12 Thread fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #2 from fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-08-12 16:40 --- (In reply to comment #1) > The arguments to random_seed are restricted to default > integer, at least up to F 2003, so we should just reject anything else. > We'd then need two versions of random_seed for kind=4 a

[Bug fortran/33054] RANDOM_SEED is broken with -fdefault-integer-8

2007-08-12 Thread tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #1 from tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-08-12 11:05 --- > Thomas, any opinion on that? The arguments to random_seed are restricted to default integer, at least up to F 2003, so we should just reject anything else. We'd then need two versions of random_seed for kind=4 an

[Bug fortran/33054] RANDOM_SEED is broken with -fdefault-integer-8

2007-08-12 Thread fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org
-- fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot |dot org